Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed.

Implementation timeline was not followed. The rebel victory created different political reality, although the transitional government respected the Arusha accord.

Information on donor conference and support are not available. However, Rwanda got net development assistance of 356.1 million in 2002.¹

Information on donor conference and support are not available. However, a transitional period ended in 2003 with the holding of the presidential and the parliamentary elections. This effectively terminated the emergency period and also would have led to a declining donor support.²“UK Support to Rwanda Background Briefing,” DFID, accessed January 30, 2015, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dfid.gov.uk/News/…

A three day donor conference took place on 14 November 2001 in Rwanda in which around 20 countries and organization including European Union, World Bank, International Monetary Fund and the African Development Bank participated. In the conference, the Rwandan government presented its National Strategic Plan to Reduce Poverty (PRSP) and spelled out progress on development programs.³ It was reported that the donors called for the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from DRC, which the finance minister refuted.⁴ Participants were pledging financial support but the exact amount is not available.

A two day donor conference from 8-9 November 2000 took place in Rwanda for the purpose of setting up global strategies to enable Rwanda to escape the vicious circle of perpetual aid, chronic debt and poverty. The conference concluded by reducing both the external debt (1.3 billion USD) and internal debt by half. In the conference, the donor agencies insisted on withdrawing troops from the DRC.⁵