Civil Administration Reform: Agreement for the Reform and Civil Concord

Written by

« Back to Accord

Civil Administration Reform: Agreement for the Reform and Civil Concord

Implementations

Civil Administration Reform – 2001

According to a 2001 report, “the Government continued to discriminate against citizens on the basis of ethnicity in employment and job advancement. Somali Issas were the majority ethnic group and controlled the ruling party, the civil and security services, and the military forces. Discrimination based on ethnicity and clan affiliation limited the role of members of minority groups and clans, particularly the Afar minority ethnic group, in government and politics.”1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2002, February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18180.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2002

The government continued to discriminate against citizens on the basis of ethnicity. Particularly Afar minority ethnic groups were discriminated.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2003, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18180.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2003

The government continued to discriminate against citizens on the basis of ethnicity even if the governing coalition is a coalition of the country’s clan and ethnic groups. Particularly Afar minority ethnic groups were discriminated.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2004, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41600.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2004

The government continued to discriminate against citizens on the basis of ethnicity even if the governing coalition was a coalition of the country’s clan and ethnic groups. Discrimination was said to have limited the role of minority groups in government and politics.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2005, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61566.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2005

The government continued to discriminate against citizens on the basis of ethnicity even if the governing coalition was a coalition of the country’s clan and ethnic groups. Discrimination was said to have limited the role of minority groups in government and politics.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2006, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78731.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2006

As per the state department report the discrimination continued based on clan and ethnicity.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2007, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2006/78731.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2007

As per the state department report, the discrimination continued based on clan and ethnicity.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2008, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100478.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2008

As per the state department report, the discrimination continued based on clan and ethnicity.1

  1. “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices- Djibouti,” U.S. State Department, 2009, accessed February 20, 2015, http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/af/118998.htm.

Civil Administration Reform – 2009

No report available on whether there was discrimination in the civil and military institutions.

Civil Administration Reform – 2010

No report available on whether there was discrimination in the civil and military institutions.